Back to blog

AI Liability Under the EU AI Act: New Frontiers in Legal Risk Management

Khadija Hasanzade

The EU's proposed AI Liability Directive is set to reshape the landscape of legal risk management for businesses operating in the AI space. As legal professionals, understanding these new regulations is crucial for effective client counseling and risk assessment.

Here's what you need to know:

Complementary Framework 
The AI Liability Directive works in tandem with the EU AI Act, creating a comprehensive regulatory environment for AI technologies. The synergy between the Directive and the Act is intended to enhance consumer protection while providing legal certainty for businesses.

Presumption of Causality 
A key feature of the directive is the introduction of a rebuttable presumption of causality. This shifts the burden of proof, making it easier for claimants to establish a causal link between non-compliance with AI regulations and resulting damages.

Disclosure of Evidence 
The directive empowers courts to order the disclosure of evidence about high-risk AI systems suspected of causing damage. This provision addresses the "black box" nature of some AI systems, potentially exposing businesses to increased scrutiny.

Expanded Scope 
Recent recommendations suggest extending the directive's provisions beyond just high-risk AI systems to include general-purpose AI models and other technologies. This could significantly broaden the liability landscape for AI developers and users.

Strict Liability Considerations 
There are calls to introduce strict liability for providers of AI systems prohibited under the AI Act. This would mean liability regardless of fault, raising the stakes for compliance.

Extraterritorial Effect 
The directive has extraterritorial reach, affecting providers and users of AI systems available or operating within the EU. This global impact necessitates a reevaluation of international risk management strategies.

For legal professionals, these developments present both challenges and opportunities. We must adapt our risk assessment methodologies, enhance our understanding of AI technologies, and provide more nuanced counsel to clients navigating this complex regulatory landscape.

As we move forward, staying informed and proactive in addressing these new liability risks will be crucial for effective legal practice in the AI era.